Monday, February 9, 2015

Planning for Technology Teach-In

Currently in my classroom we are beginning a unit on chemical bonding, and soon will be moving into intermolecular forces. Each of these topics are fairly abstract topics for students to grasp strongly, and in my own experiences in the high school chemistry classroom, typically learned through rote memorization. However, in my placement classroom we attempt to make abstract concepts easier for students to visualize by incorporating online simulations. 

For this particular lesson I am planning on having students use a PhET simulation called "States of Matter." 


Students have had experience working with this same simulation when learning about how molecules move upon being heated/cooled and therefore what it looks like at the molecular level when a substance is a solid, liquid, or gas. The general goal of this particular lesson is to bring together students' knowledge of molecules and intermolecular forces. In prior lessons they discovered what certain intermolecular forces are, such as, dipole-dipole interaction and london dispersion forces, and now they will use this simulation to gain a physical perspective of the strengths of these various forces.

Prior to starting this lesson, students will complete a warm-up activity reviewing the various types of intermolecular forces, then they will be introduced to the daily objective, and given a brief overview of how to use the simulation. Then the class will travel to the computer lab and begin the simulation activity.

Students will use a provided handout to guide them through the use and concepts involved in the simulation. Students will first complete the simulation with Neon, a nonpolar substance, and then compare the the same properties (such as boiling point) for oxygen and water. Each of these substances are included in this particular simulation.
















Students will compare the mountain-valley-hill diagram, more formally known as a potential energy diagram, for these three substances, in addition to determining important phase change values, such as the melting and boiling points. By comparing these properties, students will be able to determine the strength of various intermolecular forces using their understanding of the compounds as nonpolar or polar.

 Students will find that it takes the most energy (heat) to overcome hydrogen bonding (polar molecules), followed by dipole-dipole interactions, and then london dispersion forces. After completing this simulation the class will discuss and explain their results in a debrief session.

Using this particular online tool through PhET will allow students to gain a molecular understanding of the strength of various intermolecular forces, an abstract and microscopic topic that is generally hard to visualize. This simulation will serve as a basis for future understandings centered on this important chemistry topic.

Please let me know if you can think of any improvements to the simulation activity. My students are used to working in the computer lab on similar types of activities, but I am interested in exploring different ways to debrief the content. Typically we have a teacher-centered discussion in which the teacher asks questions and uses sticks with student names to elicit student responses. I am interested in increasing the responsibility of my students and think that some kind of group presentations to the class in which each group explains their results (perhaps dividing by different substances tested). However, we have never completed this type of activity in my mentor teacher's classroom and I would appreciate any advice, ideas, or suggestions. Thank you for you help in advance!

6 comments:

  1. Hi Mrs. Arnholt! This is such a great idea for your classroom, and I think it’s really nice that the students are familiar with PhET. I remember watching the webinar for this simulation tool, so from that presentation and from the lovely image you posted, it sure looks like a great lesson! I am wondering how long your class period is, and how long you expect this activity to take, because it is difficult for me to gauge how long students would need to discover the rankings of bond strength. I am sure your worksheet will help in the scaffolding process, so that would be really interesting to see as well! I really appreciate how you shared a range of prior knowledge that your students have, in terms of content, as well as in terms of the technology. In terms of your group presentation idea, I think this would be wonderful for the class, I just wonder what kind of structuring this activity would need if students are not used to this type of discussion. Also, would students be working at their computers individually, and then be put into groups to discuss, if you were to do group presentations, or would they be put in groups for the discovery phase as well? Either way, I’m sure the students will enjoy this lesson, and I wish I could have learned about bonds using PhET!
    - Ms. Nao

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Ms. Arnholt,
    This sounds like an awesome lesson. First off, I think it is fabulous how much your mentor teacher and you have integrated technology use into your classroom to begin with. I think that your students are already familiar with PhET will enhance their ability to use it and will enhance the learning they are able to achieve in their lesson. The usage of a handout to guide them through the simulation will be helpful for those students who may struggle with directions given orally, and will help the students have a point of reference when in the lab. I would imagine that this should also cut down on the amount of talking in the lab as well.
    I am a big fan of doing a debriefing discussion to bring the class back together and to share the information that the different groups obtained. In my history classroom, I find it helpful to pair students up who did research on similar information, give them five minutes to confer, and then they report back to the class. It resembles think-pair-share in a way, but is not exactly the same thing. One thought I had was that you could include the directions for the new form of discussion in your initial instructions so that students know what the expectation will be for their research and the class a whole.
    I can’t wait to hear how the lesson goes. Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like your plan, Kaitlynn, and your rationale for employing PHeT is well argued. You may already be thinking in these terms, but I wonder if in the end the students could be productively challenged to narrate one of the simulations and to describe in their own words what's happening. It may be that you use the PHeT tool a lot, but if you don't, I could see the students being put in the position of doing evaluations of the tool...where and how did it help them learn/visualize, where did it muddy things, etc. Sometimes putting students in a position of evaluating, rather than being evaluated, can be a productive move.
    I'm eager to hear how things turn out, Kaitlynn.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kaitlynn--It sounds like you have a really great lesson planned. As you suggested to me, I used PhET for my last lesson. As you pointed out, it did an excellent job of showing the students a more visual representation of an abstract idea. This made me very excited to try it out in the class and I think with a little bit more time, prior knowledge and scaffolding the students would have found the material to make complete sense. Thank you for the suggestions of using the simulation.

    As for your debrief question, I have never done this but maybe students could take on character roles and speak as their characters with the information they have gathered from doing the simulation. Or maybe a brief debate could take place on which bond, force, or interaction is “better.” I look forward to hearing what you decide to do and how it goes!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kaitlynn,

    I have not used PhET for my classroom yet, but we just got some computers in the back, so now I am hoping to do that soon!
    Your idea here is amazing! It is incredibly engaging and interactive. I am assuming every student will be in front of a computer because you will be in the computer lab-so this eliminates some behavior issues that can arise with waiting.
    Maybe one thing I might add is having students try different things with their simulations and compare it with each other. That can be good for a class discussion. For example if a set of students were working with Neon in the simulation and they mention it is incredibly difficult to get the particles close together (because it is a gas) maybe you can ask the class why they think this occurs. And then you can compare that to other members of the class who were dealing with water and how the molecules can be in many different phases. Just a thought if you wanted a discussion/debate type atmosphere to explain these changes.
    Otherwise, what you have here is perfect! I might even use this when we start chemical bonding very soon. Thanks for the idea!

    Anthony

    ReplyDelete